Low authority makes topical relevance the whole argument. If the site genuinely covers your subject, a $85 placement still adds context; if not, the same money buys a stronger host elsewhere in the index.
There is a second job these placements do that is worth naming: they make a young or thin profile look normal. A domain that acquires 6-level links from a spread of ordinary publications, in drips, over months, looks like a business that has been around. A domain that acquires forty links from aggressive networks in a fortnight looks like a campaign, and it is the pattern rather than the individual link that gets noticed.
Ranked against the 2,000 listings we index, facesnews.com sits in the top 94% for audience and the top 0% for authority, at $0.97 per thousand monthly visits. Inside the DA under 20 band (4 listings) that price ranks 2nd for value, which is the comparison to use: nobody competes with the whole index, they compete with the sites a buyer would book instead.
General-interest publications are the workhorses of a link profile and the easiest place to overpay. The article shape that works is boringly specific: a problem, the method used, what happened, what it cost. A general title with 88k monthly visits survives because it answers questions well, not because it loves contributors, so a piece with nothing verifiable in it gets edited down to a bio link.
The index lists this property's editorial links as followed. Availability of a followed link changes with the site's monetisation decisions, so we confirm the tag on the live URL before counting delivery.