Health · DA 54 · 3.3k visits a month

nutritionsfact.com: a contextual link, and whether it is worth $30

One contextual link inside a Health article on nutritionsfact.com, at $30, with the placement verified live before it counts as delivered. The brief covers the metrics, the article shape that survives this host's desk, and the checks we run before we send anything.

54DA (our index)
50PA · placement page
38DR · link profile
3.3kest. visits / month
$30per placement
Do-followeditorial link type
Niche
Health
Authority band
DA 50-59
Traffic band
3.3k/mo
Cost per 1,000 visits
$9.07
Typical turnaround
5–9 days
Audience language
English
Registered market
Not stated
Value rank in band
137th of 302

Request this placement Open nutritionsfact.com ↗

DA, DR and traffic come from our own index snapshot (September 2026) and are recalculated when a slot is booked; PA is our internal page-level score for the host's contributor templates, not a third-party metric. Prices are per placement in USD and move with publisher availability. Nothing here is a statement from nutritionsfact.com or an assurance of rankings — link building improves your inputs, not search engines’ outputs.

The placement

The placement, described plainly

With 3.3k estimated visits, be honest about what you are paying for: $30 buys you a permanent link on a maintained page, not exposure.

Health is a YMYL category, which means the page that hosts your link is judged on the same standards as the content on it. Editors working in this space ask for named authors, professional affiliation and a citation list because their own pages can be demoted for thin or unsourced advice. A contribution with no qualified byline is the most common rejection we see.

Two things the metrics cannot tell you, so we say them plainly: whether the host will still accept a contribution article this month, and whether the section your piece lands in is crawled weekly or monthly. Everything else on this page — 54 DA, 50 PA, 38 DR, 3,309 visits, $30, do-follow — is measured, dated September 2026, and available to you before you commit.

Where a site in this group carries 3.3k visits a month, expect the editorial desk to check whether your brand has any existing footprint: review profile, registration with the relevant professional body, a physical address. Those checks protect their own standing, and passing them quietly strengthens yours.

Our observation on this host is do-follow outbound links in editorial content. That is the attribute, not the value: the 54 DA and 3.3k monthly visits are what the attribute is attached to.

In context

Reading nutritionsfact.com's metrics against the market

Two comparisons decide whether nutritionsfact.com at $30 is a good buy: this listing against the 37 other Health entries we index, and against the whole 2,000-site index. The gap between those two answers is where a price is either justified or inherited from a rate card nobody revisited.

Metricnutritionsfact.comHealth medianWhole index
Domain Authority545440
PA — our page-level score50—clamped to the host’s DA band
DR — linking profile38—51
Est. monthly visits3.3k4.9k5.5k
Placement price$30$40$70
Cost per 1,000 visits$9.07$8.71$10.15
Traffic rank of 2,000 listings#1,244—1 = highest traffic
Price rank of 2,000 listings#1,925—1 = cheapest

The arithmetic a buyer should see: 3,309 estimated visits a month, $30 per placement, so $9.07 per thousand visits for a do-follow link on a site scoring 54 DA and 50 PA. Snapshot September 2026; availability and the exact link attribute are confirmed on the live URL before an invoice, which is the only part of this page that changes week to week.

nutritionsfact.com out-ranks 38% of the index on audience size (roughly 60% of the index median) and 87% on authority. The placement costs $9.07 per thousand estimated visits, and cheaper per visit than 55% of the DA 50-59 band. Those two figures, not the DA column alone, decide whether $30 is a good trade or just a listed one.

Suitability

Where this fits a profile

  • Services in contested regulatory markets where a neutral mention is worth more than ten directories.
  • Clinics and practices whose local pack listing needs a credible citation trail.
  • Health-tech and wellness brands that need qualified authorship they cannot produce in-house.
  • Do not buy this if the page it would sit on is already crowded with five other commercial links — we will usually flag that at the availability check and offer a different section.
  • Do not buy this as part of a burst. 5–9 days is the delivery window for one placement; a month's worth of placements across several hosts is the pattern that works.
Content brief

The content shape that survives this desk

Pitch angle: an evidence review of one specific practice, with the study limitations stated. That is the shape we take to a Health audience, because it is the version the host's own editor has a reason to keep.

  • Put one link in the body Exactly one, in the sentence where the article needs the source. A second link to your own domain is the most common reason a piece gets rewritten before publication.
  • Include one thing nobody else has A table, a chart, a worked example, a photograph you took. This is what earns the citations that make the $30 look cheap a year later.
  • Write 900–1,300 words Long enough to be worth crawling and citing, short enough that a real desk will read all of it. Anything longer gets skimmed and trimmed, and trimming is where links go.

Anchor plan for this host

  • no treatment keywords in anchors at all; on this category's pages they read as spam before a human does
  • a guideline or study citation as the outbound link, with your page as the second
Pre-order checks

Verify these before the invoice

  • Anchor history. We pull the anchors other sites have bought there. If the last twenty were all money phrases, a brand anchor from you will look natural, which is the rare and useful direction.
  • What happens on removal. nutritionsfact.com is covered by the same 12-month replacement terms as every other listing, which means a dropped link is rebuilt and re-reported rather than argued about.
  • Template stability. Redesigns and CMS migrations kill placements. We check the age of the site's oldest surviving article as a proxy for how long a page there tends to live.
  • Ownership. Several of the listings in our index turn out to share a publisher or an ad network. Relevance does not multiply when five links come from one hand, so we check the footer, the registration and the ad slots.
Delivery

Delivery, step by step

  1. You send the target URL and your angle The page you want the link to point at, the subject, and any author you want credited. Five minutes of input.
  2. We confirm availability on nutritionsfact.com Publisher slots move week to week, including on 54 DA properties. Nothing is promised until the section and the placement URL are confirmed, and we tell you before you pay if the slot has gone.
  3. You approve the brief and the shortlist Where the host gives a choice of section or existing article, we send options with the numbers that matter: traffic, indexation, neighbours.
  4. The article is drafted and edited for the host Written for nutritionsfact.com's audience rather than for your keyword, then checked against the site's own style before submission.
  5. The host publishes; we verify the live URL Placement live, correct target, link attribute as recorded, indexable. Only then does the order count as delivered.
  6. You get the report, and the replacement cover starts PDF and CSV with the live URL, anchor, placement date and target page. Twelve-month replacement on the link itself, no ticket required.
Pricing

Cost, and what moves it

If the article you want published needs expert authorship, data or photography, that work is included; if it needs a regulated-industry review, say so early, because it changes the timeline rather than the price.

What comes with this placement

  • One contextual placement inside an article written for nutritionsfact.com's audience, not a link directory entry.
  • Availability confirmed on the exact URL before you are invoiced.
  • Live-URL verification, with a dated record of the placement.
  • Anchor and target page exactly as approved in the brief, or the placement is not counted.
FAQ

Questions about a nutritionsfact.com placement

Only if you are buying the citation and the audience, not the anchor. At that traffic level the referral trickle will be small because health readers rarely click through to commercial services from an article, and the search value depends entirely on whether the page stays in the index and stays topically close to your work. Compared with the Health median of $40 in our index, you are paying 25% below the median for the placement; judge it on the trust it adds to a profile that otherwise looks thin.

By the tests we run, no: 3.3k estimated monthly visits, a 54 DA score and 38 DR are not the shape of a network built to sell links, and the site's own publishing activity is visible. What we cannot certify is what happens after our snapshot — a site can be sold, a section can be converted into a link shop, a CMS migration can drop a page. That is why the live URL is re-checked before delivery and why the replacement cover exists.

DA 54 describes the domain. The PA figure here (50) is our own page-level score for the templates that would carry your placement: how deep the site links them, how much of the domain's crawl budget and internal weight reaches them, how old and how referenced they are. A site can hold 54 DA while its contributor template scores 50, and it is the template that your link sits in.

Rebuilt and re-reported, under the same 12-month cover as every placement in the index. Links drop for boring reasons — redesigns, content pruning, a host losing interest in contributor content — and nutritionsfact.com is no more immune than a 54 DA site usually is. We monitor rather than waiting for you to notice.

The index median across all 2,000 listings is $70, so this listing is 25% below the median. Against the Health median of $40 it is below the going rate for its category. Fair is a function of durability and audience rather than of the average, but if you want to argue about the number, those are the two comparisons worth arguing from.

Mechanically: DA 54 against a median of 54, 3.3k monthly visits against 4.9k, $30 against a median of $40. That puts this listing 25% below the median on price and below the index median on audience within its own section of the index, which is the only comparison worth making when you are spending $30.

Book this slot, or ask for something closer to your market

Send the URL you want the link to point at and we confirm availability on nutritionsfact.com before you are invoiced — or we shortlist three comparable listings from the Health section of the index instead.

Request this placement Browse all 2,000 site briefs