General · DA 41 · 68.1k visits a month

Publishing on techlawnews.com — metrics, brief and price

techlawnews.com is not a link farm by our measurements — 68.1k monthly visits and a 41 DA score say otherwise — so the question stops being 'is it real' and becomes 'is this slot worth $90 for your site'. The arithmetic below answers that; the editorial judgement is yours.

41DA (our index)
42PA · placement page
57DR · link profile
68.1kest. visits / month
$90per placement
Do-followeditorial link type
Niche
General
Authority band
DA 40-49
Traffic band
68.1k/mo
Cost per 1,000 visits
$1.32
Typical turnaround
10–16 days
Audience language
English
Registered market
Not stated
Value rank in band
63rd of 703

Request this placement Open techlawnews.com ↗

DA, DR and traffic come from our own index snapshot (September 2026) and are recalculated when a slot is booked; PA is our internal page-level score for the host's contributor templates, not a third-party metric. Prices are per placement in USD and move with publisher availability. Nothing here is a statement from techlawnews.com or an assurance of rankings — link building improves your inputs, not search engines’ outputs.

The placement

What this slot does and does not do

68.1k a month is solid mid-size traffic: enough that the host maintains its pages, small enough that a well-written contribution stands out in the queue.

General-interest publications are the workhorses of a link profile and the easiest place to overpay. The article shape that works is boringly specific: a problem, the method used, what happened, what it cost. A general title with 68.1k monthly visits survives because it answers questions well, not because it loves contributors, so a piece with nothing verifiable in it gets edited down to a bio link.

Two things the metrics cannot tell you, so we say them plainly: whether the host will still accept a contribution article this month, and whether the section your piece lands in is crawled weekly or monthly. Everything else on this page — 41 DA, 42 PA, 57 DR, 68,100 visits, $90, do-follow — is measured, dated September 2026, and available to you before you commit.

Generalist inventory also varies more than any other kind, which is why the numbers in this brief matter more than the label. A 41 DA domain with 68.1k estimated monthly visits and Do-follow links is a different product from the same DA with a tenth of the traffic, and they are priced too close together in most catalogues.

Our observation on this host is do-follow outbound links in editorial content. That is the attribute, not the value: the 41 DA and 68.1k monthly visits are what the attribute is attached to.

In context

techlawnews.com in the numbers, compared with the rest of our index

Two comparisons decide whether techlawnews.com at $90 is a good buy: this listing against the 1,576 other General entries we index, and against the whole 2,000-site index. The gap between those two answers is where a price is either justified or inherited from a rate card nobody revisited.

Metrictechlawnews.comGeneral medianWhole index
Domain Authority413940
PA — our page-level score42—clamped to the host’s DA band
DR — linking profile57—51
Est. monthly visits68.1k5k5.5k
Placement price$90$70$70
Cost per 1,000 visits$1.32$14$10.15
Traffic rank of 2,000 listings#145—1 = highest traffic
Price rank of 2,000 listings#77—1 = cheapest

The arithmetic a buyer should see: 68,100 estimated visits a month, $90 per placement, so $1.32 per thousand visits for a do-follow link on a site scoring 41 DA and 42 PA. Snapshot September 2026; availability and the exact link attribute are confirmed on the live URL before an invoice, which is the only part of this page that changes week to week.

techlawnews.com out-ranks 93% of the index on audience size (about 12.4× the index median) and 62% on authority. The placement costs $1.32 per thousand estimated visits, and cheaper per visit than 91% of the DA 40-49 band. Those two figures, not the DA column alone, decide whether $90 is a good trade or just a listed one.

Suitability

Buy it if, skip it if

  • Agencies filling a monthly quota with links nobody will object to.
  • New domains that need a plausible first set of citations before anything ambitious.
  • Thin profiles where diversity matters more than raw authority.
  • Do not buy this if the page it would sit on is already crowded with five other commercial links — we will usually flag that at the availability check and offer a different section.
  • Do not buy this if your profile has no branded searches yet and this is meant to be the single link that changes that. One 41 DA placement on a General site is a start, not a strategy.
Content brief

Writing for this host: the brief

Pitch angle: a data note built from something you have measured. That is the shape we take to a General audience, because it is the version the host's own editor has a reason to keep.

  • Write 900–1,300 words Long enough to be worth crawling and citing, short enough that a real desk will read all of it. Anything longer gets skimmed and trimmed, and trimming is where links go.
  • Include one thing nobody else has A table, a chart, a worked example, a photograph you took. This is what earns the citations that make the $90 look cheap a year later.
  • Put one link in the body Exactly one, in the sentence where the article needs the source. A second link to your own domain is the most common reason a piece gets rewritten before publication.

Anchor plan for this host

  • a descriptive anchor that repeats a phrase the article already uses naturally
  • if you already have links from similar sites, vary the anchor shape entirely
Pre-order checks

Before you order: six checks on techlawnews.com

  • Link attribute on a live example. Not the pitch, not the rate card: the rel attribute on an outbound link in a real article published this month.
  • Template stability. Redesigns and CMS migrations kill placements. We check the age of the site's oldest surviving article as a proxy for how long a page there tends to live.
  • Editorial activity. A site with 68.1k monthly visits and nothing published in six months is a decaying asset, and decaying assets get dropped from the index in batches.
  • Indexation of the host's recent output. We run site:techlawnews.com and compare the count against the site's publishing rate. A property publishing weekly with a fraction of its pages indexed has a crawl or quality problem you would inherit.
Delivery

Delivery, step by step

  1. You send the target URL and your angle The page you want the link to point at, the subject, and any author you want credited. Five minutes of input.
  2. We confirm availability on techlawnews.com Publisher slots move week to week, including on 41 DA properties. Nothing is promised until the section and the placement URL are confirmed, and we tell you before you pay if the slot has gone.
  3. You approve the brief and the shortlist Where the host gives a choice of section or existing article, we send options with the numbers that matter: traffic, indexation, neighbours.
  4. The article is drafted and edited for the host Written for techlawnews.com's audience rather than for your keyword, then checked against the site's own style before submission.
  5. The host publishes; we verify the live URL Placement live, correct target, link attribute as recorded, indexable. Only then does the order count as delivered.
  6. You get the report, and the replacement cover starts PDF and CSV with the live URL, anchor, placement date and target page. Twelve-month replacement on the link itself, no ticket required.
Pricing

Pricing on this placement

If the article you want published needs expert authorship, data or photography, that work is included; if it needs a regulated-industry review, say so early, because it changes the timeline rather than the price.

What comes with this placement

  • The article itself, drafted to the host's style and edited before submission.
  • Anchor and target page exactly as approved in the brief, or the placement is not counted.
  • Live-URL verification, with a dated record of the placement.
  • 12-month replacement cover: if the link drops, we rebuild it.
FAQ

Questions about a techlawnews.com placement

Compare it with the market rather than the label. In our index the median general listing is priced at $70 with a median DA of 39 and median traffic of 5k, which puts techlawnews.com 29% above the median and about 12.4× the index median. If the article you place there is specific enough to be cited by someone else, you have bought an asset. If it is filler, you have bought 41 points of something nobody reads.

By the tests we run, no: 68.1k estimated monthly visits, a 41 DA score and 57 DR are not the shape of a network built to sell links, and the site's own publishing activity is visible. What we cannot certify is what happens after our snapshot — a site can be sold, a section can be converted into a link shop, a CMS migration can drop a page. That is why the live URL is re-checked before delivery and why the replacement cover exists.

DA 41 describes the domain. The PA figure here (42) is our own page-level score for the templates that would carry your placement: how deep the site links them, how much of the domain's crawl budget and internal weight reaches them, how old and how referenced they are. A site can hold 41 DA while its contributor template scores 42, and it is the template that your link sits in.

Rebuilt and re-reported, under the same 12-month cover as every placement in the index. Links drop for boring reasons — redesigns, content pruning, a host losing interest in contributor content — and techlawnews.com is no more immune than a 41 DA site usually is. We monitor rather than waiting for you to notice.

Mechanically: DA 41 against a median of 39, 68.1k monthly visits against 5k, $90 against a median of $70. That puts this listing 29% above the median on price and well above the index median on audience within its own section of the index, which is the only comparison worth making when you are spending $90.

Where the host asks for it, yes, and we would rather you knew that in advance than found it on the published page. A disclosure label has not cost any client of ours a placement's value; an undisclosed one that gets quietly removed has cost several.

Book this slot, or ask for something closer to your market

Send the URL you want the link to point at and we confirm availability on techlawnews.com before you are invoiced — or we shortlist three comparable listings from the General section of the index instead.

Request this placement Browse all 2,000 site briefs